Preview

Archives of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery

Advanced search

Analysis of treatment outcomes of extensive bowel resections in newborns and infants

https://doi.org/10.66825/2949-4664-apps-3-3-4-13

Abstract

Objective. The outcomes of multiple intestinal resections in children may be accompanied by severe complications, including postresection short bowel syndrome (PSBS) and chronic intestinal failure (CIF). Such patients experience severe growth and developmental delays and often require long-term parenteral nutrition. Currently, a unified classification that could enable objective assessment of the risks of PSBS is lacking. The available approaches fail to account for the entire range of factors and are difficult to apply in clinical practice.

Materials and methods. In total, 80 patients with resections of various sections of the intestine were included in the study. Children with extensive resections were distinguished into a separate group (n = 42), with inclusion criteria being resection of more than one-third of one section or two or more sections of the intestine. The diagnostic criteria for PSBS were pathological intestinal stoma losses of 30 ml/kg/day or greater and a total stool and urine volume of 60 ml/kg/day or greater. The diagnostic criteria for CIF were prolonged parenteral nutrition with the inability to achieve enteral autonomy during the period of more than two months.

Results. Necrotizing enterocolitis and congenital malformations of the small intestine, including those associated with intestinal malrotation, were found to be the most common reasons for resection. Almost half of the cases accounted for ileum resections (42.7%), with the share of large bowel resections being 16.1%. In the extensive resection group (n = 42), resection of more than 2/3 of the jejunum statistically significantly resulted in the development of PSBS, while resection of more than 2/3 of the large bowel statistically significantly aggravated the prognosis. It was shown that PSBS developed in 60% of cases involving two sections of the intestine, amounting to 80% when three sections were involved. Resection of the ileocecal junction had no statistically significant effect on outcomes.

Conclusion. The currently available approaches to predicting outcomes after extensive bowel resections in children fail to take into account the entire range of nosologies, as well as intraoperative and postoperative criteria. Further analysis of the results obtained is needed to form a basis for developing a surgical classification for PSBS prediction. Such a classification will facilitate the process of decision making for surgeons and pediatricians involved in the treatment of children with PSBS and CIF.

About the Authors

A. S. Gurskaya
National Medical Research Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Aleksandra S. Gurskaya, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Newborns and Infants Surgery Unit; Assistant Professor of the Department of Pediatric Surgery with a Course of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation at the Institute of Medical Personnel Training

2 build. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



R. R. Bayazitov
National Medical Research Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Rimir R. Bayazitov, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Pediatric Surgeon of the Newborns and Infants Surgery Unit 

2 build. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



E. V. Ekimovskaya
National Medical Research Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Ekaterina V. Ekimovskaya, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Pediatric Surgeon of the Newborns and Infants Surgery Unit 

2 build. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



S. N. Zorkin
National Medical Research Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Sergei N. Zorkin, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Head of the Research Institute for Pediatric Nephrourology; Head of the Urology Department with Reproductive Medicine and Transplantation Groups

2 build. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



E. Yu. Dyakonova
National Medical Research Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Yelena Yu. Dyakonova, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Prof., Head of the General and Selective Surgery Unit of Science and Research Institute of Pediatric Surgery; Head of the Pediatric Surgery Department with a Course of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation at the Institute of Medical Personnel Training

2 build. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



I. V. Karnuta
National Medical Research Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Inna V. Karnuta, Junior Research Fellow, Pediatric Surgeon of the Newborns and Infants Surgery Unit 

2 build. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



M. A. Sulavko
National Medical Research Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Mariya A. Sulavko, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Junior Research Fellow, Pediatric Surgeon of the Newborns and Infants Surgery Unit 

2 build. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



F. S. Piloyan
National Medical Research Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Felix S. Piloyan, PhD Researcher, Resident of the Pediatric Surgery Department with a Course of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation at the Institute of Medical Personnel Training; Pediatric Surgeon of the Newborns and Infants Surgery Unit 

2 build. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



A. S. Chernyavskaya
National Medical Research Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Anastasia S. Chernyavskaya, Cand. Sci. (Med.), neonatologist, pediatrician of the Newborns and Infants Surgery Unit 

2 build. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



D. M. Akhmedova
National Medical Research Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Dinara M. Akhmedova, Neonatologist of the Newborns and Infants Surgery Unit 

2 build. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



O. N. Nakovkin
National Medical Research Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Oleg N. Nakovkin, Head of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit 

2 build. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



D. V. Khazykova
National Medical Research Center of Children’s Health
Russian Federation

Dzhirgal V. Khazykova, Diagnostic Medical Sonographer, Head of Diagnostic Medical Sonography Unit 

2 build. 1, Lomonosovsky Prospect, Moscow, 119991


Competing Interests:

The authors declare no conflict of interest



References

1. Oliveira C., de Silva N. T., Stanojevic S., et al. Change of Outcomes in Pediatric Intestinal Failure: Use of Time-Series Analysis to Assess the Evolution of an Intestinal Rehabilitation Program. J.Am. Coll. Surg. 2016;222(6):1180–1188. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.007

2. Averianova Yu.V., Vessel L. M., Erpuleva Yu.V., et al. Federal clinical guidelines «Treatment of children with short bowel syndrome.» Russian Bulletin of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesiology, and Resuscitation. 2014;4(4):92–108. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=rkuckq

3. BatraA., Keys S. C., Johnson M. J., Wheeler R.A., Beattie R. M. Epidemiology, management, and outcome of ultrashort bowel syndrome in infancy. Arch Dis Childhood-Fetal Neonatal Edition. 2017;102:551–556. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2016-311765.

4. Shang S. et al. A new classification for surgical NEC during exploratory laparotomy: introduction and reproducibility assessment. Pediatric surgery international. 2024;40(108):2. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05685-1.

5. Modi B. P., Galloway D. P., GuraK., NucciA. et al. ASPEN definitions in pediatric intestinal failure. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022;46:42–59. doi: 10.1002/jpen.2232.

6. Dyakonova E.Yu., GurskayaA. S., Nakovkin O. N., et al. Congenital short small bowel syndrome: a clinical observation and literature review. Grekov Surgery Bulletin. 2020;179(4):91–97. (In Russ.). doi:10.24884/0042-4625-2020-179-4-91-97.

7. Demehri F. R., Stephens L., Herrman E., et al. Enteral autonomy in pediatric short bowel syndrome: predictive factors one year after diagnosis. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2015;50:131–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.10.011.

8. Khasanov R. R., GumerovA.A., Vessel L. M.The role of small intestine length in the development of short bowel syndrome. Surgery. 2017;1:63–67. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/hirurgia2017163-67.

9. Weih S., Kessler M., Fonouni H., et al. Current practice and future perspectives in the treatment of short bowel syndrome in children — a systematic review. Langenbeck’s archives of surgery. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. 2012;397:1043–1051. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0874-8.

10. KhavkinA.I., Volynets G. V., Skvortsova T.A. Short bowel syndrome: modern approaches to therapy. Issues of Practical Pediatrics. 2019;14(1):70–75. (In Russ.). doi: 10.20953/1817-7646-2019-1-70-75.

11. Mokrushina O. G., Gurskaya A. S., Skvortsova V. A., Nakovkin O. N., et al. Principles of surgical treatment of infants at risk for developing post-resection short bowel syndrome and chronic intestinal failure: analysis of the results of a series of clinical observations. Pediatrics im. G. N. Speransky. 2022;101(4):165–72. (In Russ.). doi: 10.24110/0031-403X-2022-101-4-165-172.

12. Karpeeva Yu.S., Novikova V. P., KhavkinA.I. Short bowel syndrome: from presentation to treatment. Issues in pediatric dietetics. 2021;19(6):75–85. (In Russ.). doi: 10.20953/1727-5784-2021-6-75-85.

13. Dogra S., Peters N. J., Samujh R. Short Bowel Syndrome in neonates and early infancy. Journal of Neonatal Surgery. 2023;12:1148. doi: 10.52783/JNS.V12.1148.

14. Kostomarova E.A. Rehabilitation of children with short bowel syndrome and other forms of chronic intestinal failure. Abstract of PhD diss. Moscow; 2019. (In Russ.). https://rsmu.ru/fileadmin/templates/DOC/Disser/18/d_kostomarova_ea.pdf

15. Wales P. W., de Silva N., Kim J. et al. Neonatal short bowel syndrome: Population-based estimates of incidence and mortality rates. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2004;39:690–695. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.01.036.

16. Shemenkova V. S. Principles of managing patients with short bowel syndrome. Medical Council. 2023;17(23):144– 148. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21518/ms2023-490.

17. BalabanovA. S., PavlovA.I., Gulyaev N.I. Short bowel syndrome: clinical and pathophysiological relationships. Clinical pathophysiology. 2022;28(2):64–71. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/terarkh20178912144-149.

18. Bardwell C., El Demellawy D., Oltean I. et al. Establishing normal ranges for fetal and neonatal small and large intestinal lengths: results from a prospective postmortem study. World Jnl Ped Surgery. 2022;5: e000397. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2021-000397.

19. MerrittR.J. Mean measured small bowel length in infants and young children. JPGN.2017;65(5):589. https://media.starship.org.nz/Mean-measured-small-bowel-length/Mean_measured_small_bowel_length.pdf

20. Pakarinen M. P., Pakkasjarvi N., Merras-Salmio L., et al. Intestinal rehabilitation of infantile onset very short bowel syndrome. Journal of pediatric surgery. 2015;50:289–292. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.11.018.

21. Luft V. M., SergeevaA. M., LapitskyA. V. Short bowel syndrome in adults: clinical manifestations and possibilities of differentiated therapy. University Therapeutic Bulletin. 2024;6(2):21–31. (In Russ.). doi: 10.56871/UTJ.2024.94.94.003.

22. PereyaslovA.A., LosevA.A. Short bowel syndrome in children (literature review). Surgery. Eastern Europe. 2018;7(1):115–132. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32664872

23. Rossi L., Kadamba P., Hugosson C., De Vol E. B. et al. Pediatric short bowel syndrome: adaptation after massive small bowel resection. J. Pediatr. 2007;45(2):213– 221. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31803c75e8.

24. KhripunA.I., Shurygin S. N., PryamikovA. D., MironkovA. B., et al. Extensive intestinal resections and short bowel syndrome in patients with acute mesenteric circulatory disorder. Surgery. N.I. Pirogov Journal. 2012;2:14–18. (In Russ.). https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/khirurgiya-zhurnal-im-n-i-pirogova/2012/2/030023–1207201222


Review

For citations:


Gurskaya A.S., Bayazitov R.R., Ekimovskaya E.V., Zorkin S.N., Dyakonova E.Yu., Karnuta I.V., Sulavko M.A., Piloyan F.S., Chernyavskaya A.S., Akhmedova D.M., Nakovkin O.N., Khazykova D.V. Analysis of treatment outcomes of extensive bowel resections in newborns and infants. Archives of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery. 2025;3(3):4-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.66825/2949-4664-apps-3-3-4-13

Views: 56

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-4664 (Print)
ISSN 3033-6783 (Online)