Evaluating the effect of СFTR modulators on lung function in children with cystic fibrosis with F508del/F508del genotype
https://doi.org/10.66825/2949-4664-apps-3-3-38-45
Abstract
Background. The therapy of CFTR modulators for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients is a priority task. Since November 2021, children and adolescents with CF in Russia have been provided with the lumacaftor/ivacaftor and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor + ivacaftor treatment, funded by the «Krug Dobra» (Circle of Goodness) Foundation. The impact of therapy on lung function in CF is of great interest and is crucial for evaluating its effectiveness.
Objective: to evaluate the impact of CFTR modulators — lumacaftor/ivacaftor and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor + ivacaftor — on lung function in CF patients with the F508del/F508del genotype.
Materials and methods. A retrospective, observational, longterm study of respiratory function data was conducted in children and adolescents with the F508del/F508del genotype receiving therapy with lumacaftor/ivacaftor (n = 96) and elexacaftor/ tezacaftor/ivacaftor + ivacaftor (n = 14) using data from national CF patient registries in 2019 and 2022.
Results. In the general group of patients receiving CFTR modulators, respiratory function indicators did not change statistically significantly. However, they tended to decrease: mediana (Me) FEV1 in 2019 was 85.0% compared to 83.5% in 2022; a decrease in Me FEV1 by 1.5 p.p. Me FVC in 2019 was 89.0% compared to 88.1% in 2022. The decrease in Me FVC was 0.9 p.p. During therapy with lumacaftor/ivacaftor or elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ ivacaftor + ivacaftor, the FEV1 parameters showed no statistically significant changes. In patients receiving therapy with lumacaftor/ivacaftor, Me FEV1 decreased from 85.0% to 81.4%, Me FVC — from 89.0% to 88.1%. Me FEV1 decreased by 3.6 p.p, and Me FVC decreased by 0.9 p.p. In patients receiving therapy with elexafactor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor + ivacaftor, FEV1 parameters tended to increase: Me FEV1 increased from 81.2% to 82.0%, and Me FVC — from 81.4% to 87.0%. Me FEV1 increased by 0.8 p.p, and Me FVC increased by 5.6 p.p.
Conclusions. The conducted assessment of the impact of CFTR modulators on lung function in children revealed that in patients with the F508del/F508 genotype, both FEV1 and FVC values did not decrease statistically significantly in 2022 compared to 2019. This can be considered a positive factor in terms of the impact of therapy on the course of CF. However, under lumacaftor/ivacaftor therapy, FVC values tended to decrease. For comparison, the elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor + ivacaftor combination, despite lower baseline FVC values, led to an increase in these indicators.
About the Authors
V. V. ShadrinaRussian Federation
Vera V. Shadrina, Cand. Sci. (Med.), head of the Department of Hereditary and Metabolic Diseases; leading research fellow of the scientific-clinical Cystic Fibrosis Department
24A, bldg. 1, Kominterna str., Mytishchi, 141009; 1, Moskvorechye str., Moscow, 115522
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
A. S. Sorokin
Russian Federation
Alexander S. Sorokin, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), leading research fellow at the Department of Hereditary and Metabolic Diseases; Associate Professor of the Department
24A, bldg. 1, Kominterna str., Mytishchi, 141009; 36, Stremyanny Lane, Moscow, 115054
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interest
References
1. Website of the Circle of Good Foundation (https://фондкругдобра.рф/перечни/перечень-категорий-детей/) (Accessed 09.12.2024).
2. Kondratieva E.I., Odinaeva N.D., Voronkova A. Yu., Sherman V.D., Zhekaite E.K., Orlov A.V., Safonova T.I., Kozlova E.A., Shulyak I.P., Erzutova M.V., Pyaterkina O.G., Psyurnikova O.S., Bondarenko T.P., Kondakova Yu.A., Seroklinov V.N., Ilyenkova N.A., Pasnova E.V., Fatkhullina I.R., Maksimycheva T. Yu., Kutsev S.I. Efficacy of targeted therapy with lumacaftor/ivacaftor in children with cystic fibrosis (12 month follow-up). Archives of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery. 2023;1(1):50– 58. (In Russ.). doi: 10.31146/2949-4664-apps-1-1-50-58
3. Shumkova G.L., Amelina E.L., Krasovsky S.A., Krylova N.A. Features of the course of chronic rhinosinusitis. Pul’monologiya. 2024;34(2):257–263. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18093/0869-0189-2024-34-2-257-263.
4. Wainwright C.E., Elborn J.S., Ramsey B.W., Marigowda G., Huang X., Cipolli M., Colombo C., Davies J.C., De Boeck K., Flume P.A., et al. Lumacaftor-ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis homozygous for Phe508del CFTR.N. Engl. J. Med. 2015;373:220–231.
5. McNally P., Linnane B., Williamson M., Elnazir B., Short C., Saunders C., Kirwan L., David R., KemnerVan de Corput M.P.C., Tiddens H.A.W.M., Davies J.C., Cox D.W. The clinical impact of Lumacaftor-Ivacaftor on structural lung disease and lung function in children aged 6–11 with cystic fibrosis in a real-world setting. Respir Res. 2023 Aug 11;24(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02497-0. PMID: 37568199; PMCID: PMC10416528.]
6. Burgel P.R., Durieu I., Chiron R., Mely L., Prevotat A., Murris-Espin M., Porzio M., Abely M., Reix P., Marguet C., Macey J., Sermet-Gaudelus I., Corvol H., Bui S., Biouhee T., Hubert D., Munck A., Lemonnier L., Dehillotte C., Silva J.D., Paillasseur J.L., Martin C. French Cystic Fibrosis Reference Network study group. Clinical response to lumacaftor-ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis according to baseline lung function. J Cyst Fibros. 2021 Mar;20(2):220–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.06.012. Epub 2020 Jun 24. PMID: 32591294
7. Bacalhau M., Camargo M., Magalhaes-Ghiotto G.A.V., Drumond S., Castelletti C.H. M., LopesPacheco M. Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor: A LifeChanging Triple Combination ofCFTR Modulator Drugs for CysticFibrosis. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16:410. doi: 10.3390/ph16030410
8. Chuchalin A.G., Aysanov Z.R., Chikina S. Yu., Chernyak A.V., Kalmanova E.N. Federal guidelines of Russian Respiratory Society on spirometry. Pulmonologiya. 2014;(6):11–24. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18093/0869-0189-2014-0-6-11-24.
9. Miller M.R., Hankinson J., Brusasco V. et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur. Respir. J. 2005;26(2):319–337. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00034805.
10. Harun S.N., Wainwright C., Klein K., Hennig S. A systematic review of studies examining the rate of lung function decline in patients with cystic fibrosis. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2016 Sep;20:55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 14. PMID: 27259460.
11. Shadrina V.V., Voronkova A. Yu., Starinova M.А., Kashirskaya N. Yu., Simonova O.I., Sergienko D.F., Semykin S. Yu., Kon dratyeva E.I. The effect of age and genotype on lung function in children with cystic fibrosis. Pul’monologiya. 2021;31(2):159–166 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18093/0869-0189-2021-31-2-159-166.
12. Leung G.J., Cho T.J., Kovesi T., Hamid J.S., Radhakrishnan D. Variation in lung function and nutritional decline in cystic fibrosis by genotype: An analysis of the Canadian cystic fibrosis registry. J Cyst Fibros. 2020 Mar;19(2):255–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jun 26. PMID: 31253541.
13. Kondratyeva E.I., Zhekaite E.K., Voronkova A. Yu., Fatkhullina I.R., Sherman V.D., Shadrina V.V., Odinaeva N.D. Age-related peculiarities of the efficiency of the CFTR Modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in patients with cystic fibrosis. Russian Pediatric Journal. 2025;28(4S):40–41. (In Russ.). EDN: aklfgz.
14. Kondratyeva E.I., Fatkhullina I.R., Zhekaite E.K., Sherman V.D., Voronkova A. Yu. Efficacy and safety of the CFTR-modulator lumacaftor/ivacaftor use in patients with cystic fibrosis in different age groups. Pediatria n.a. G.N. Speransky. 2024;103(5):46–56. doi: 10.24110/0031-403X-2024-103-5-46-56.
Review
For citations:
Shadrina V.V., Sorokin A.S. Evaluating the effect of СFTR modulators on lung function in children with cystic fibrosis with F508del/F508del genotype. Archives of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery. 2025;3(3):38-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.66825/2949-4664-apps-3-3-38-45
JATS XML














